FBI Admits:
No Evidence Links 'Hijackers' To 911
Exclusive To American Free Press
By Michael Collins Piper 5-18-2
The possibility that 19 Muslim men accused of being the Sept. 11 hijackers
were not, in fact, the hijackers, is not so extraordinary an idea as it
might seem. After seven months of non-stop declarations by U.S. government
spokesmen that there exists solid proof tying 19 Muslim men to plotting the
Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, FBI Director Robert Mueller has now admitted
quite the opposite. That 19 Muslim men who have apparently disappeared have
been named as the hijackers is not in doubt.
What is in doubt is whether those 19 men were actually plotting anything,
either individually or together. The amazing possibility remains that others
carried out the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, using the identities of the 19
Muslims who have been assigned guilt in the tragedy. In an April 19 speech
delivered to the Common wealth Club in San Francisco, Mueller said that the
purported hijackers, in his words, "left no paper trial." The FBI director
stated flatly: In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of
paper-either here in the United States or in the treasure trove of
information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere-that mentioned
any aspect of the Sept. 11 plot.
In describing Mueller's evidence fiasco, Los Angeles Times reporters Erich
Lichtblau and Josh Meyer, whose article was reprinted in The Washington Post
on April 30, note that: Law enforcement officials say that while they have
been able to reconstruct the movements of the hijackers before the
attacks-all legal except for a few speeding tickets-they have found no
evidence of their actual plotting. The Times reporters acknowledge that
Mueller's comments "offer the FBI's most comprehensive and detailed
assessment to date of its investigation, remarkable as much for what
investigators have not found as for what they have."
The FBI director explained away the absence of evidence by making the
disingenuous assertion that the hijackers used "meticulous planning,
extraordinary secrecy and extensive knowledge of how America works" to
conceal their scheme. Mueller made this claim despite the fact that in the
immediate wake of the Sept. 11 attacks, a variety of U.S. officials and
media sources speciously announced, almost instantaneously, that there was
firm evidence not only that these 19 Muslim men were agents of Osama bin
Laden's al Qaeda "network" but that they were indeed the individuals who
hijacked the doomed flights on Sept. 11.
Mueller seems to forget that early government and media reports loudly hyped
"discoveries"-letters and other documents-in the luggage and personal
belongings of the presumed hijackers which "proved" that they were on a
"mission for Allah," etc etc. Now Mueller's comments seem to contradict
everything that's been said. http://www.americanfreepress.net
-------
In addition:
This is some proof that the CIA and Mossad did the 911 together. Here is the
US working out with Israel when to hit and what. Israeli part in the 911 was
for payment for the US hit on Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein in the near
future. The US would have hit long ago but ran into some internal support
problems.
TOTAL CORRUPTION IN HIGH PLACES.
Neal
ATTEMPTING TO EXPLAIN THE UNEXPLAINABLE
To the great surprise of many who watched on television Ariel Sharon's angry
response to the bombing in Rishon LeTzion and his hurried return to Israel,
the IDF was ordered not to enter Gaza in a counter-terrorism sweep such as
was accomplished in Jenin. Everyone expected them to do so yet the operation
was canceled.
What's going on?
There are growing indications that the United States is preparing to strike
Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein in the near future, and not sometime next year
as has been recently postulated. If so, the American administration in
cooperation with Israel wants to be sure that Saddam is deprived of any
excuse to pre-empt the American military assault. Since a major Israeli army
operation in Gaza would most likely result in significant Palestinian
casualties and most probably 'push the button' to send the entire Middle
East tumbling into war, Saddam could easily order a missile strike against
Israel and then announce he was coming to Arafat’s rescue, along with
Hizbullah and possibly its Syrian backers. Any American military action upon
Iraq at that point would certainly look like it was mainly in support of the
widely hated “Zionist entity” and not an American initiated and directed
attack against the Iraqi dictator.
Israel fully expects Saddam to shoot strategic missiles at the tiny Jewish
State in response to any American anti-terror assault. Intelligence sources
report that Palestinian militants will launch new terrorist assaults inside
Israeli cities in support of Saddam. Therefore, it appears that the best
time for the IDF to invade the Gaza Strip and destroy the Hamas and Islamic
Jihad terrorist centers is immediately after an Iraqi attack.
--
|