The Enemy Within - the Illusion Without
by Ivan Fraser
On September 11th 2001, the world was numbed by not only 'the largest
terrorist attack', but also the biggest media event, in history. Hollywood,
it seems, has come true!
Within minutes, they were comparing the attack on America with Pearl
Harbour; the massive blockbuster movie of the same name only recently having
left the 'big screen' and still fresh in the minds of millions. 'It's like a
movie,' was the initial response of millions of stunned onlookers.
What the movie did not reveal, however, was that - like the sinking of the
Lusitania, which brought America into World War I, Pearl Harbour was no
sudden unannounced terrorist attack - Roosevelt knew of the coming attack
from intelligence sources but did not evacuate the naval base; instead, it
was allowed to go ahead in order that this could be used for propaganda
purposes to allow him to graciously go back on his promise to the American
people that they would not be drawn into another war.
Increasingly, big-budget War and Disaster movies have been appearing in our
movie theatres over the past decade, including the likes of Independence
Day, Armageddon, Die Hard…etc.
Luckily, we've all seen these cracking yarns - they are now a part of our
collective psyche - and therefore we know instinctively how to react to such
dramatic situations. We react in the way the movies taught us, don't we? We
don our uniforms, enlist, cry 'God Bless America' and go looking for someone
to kill. We go to fight to protect the freedom of our great country and that
of the entire 'civilised world'. We place our total trust in the
authorities, the military and the political leaders. Remember how the
President saved us in Independence Day? Didn't the great generals
comprehensively whip the enemy after Pearl Harbour to protect the 'free
world'?
If only we could send in Arnie, Sly, Tom Hanks and Will Smith. They've
already sent in the USS Enterprise to sort out those evil aliens.
Will the President nuke 'em like he did at the end of World War II? Will he
unveil the astounding technology he's been saving for a rainy day? Or will
they send in a lone hero to take 'em out in a victorious climax, just when
everything looks as though it's all going pear-shaped? And will Bruce Willis
keep his vest on?
God, I'm proud to be an American today!
What do you mean, I'm not American? We're all Americans now. The tv told us
that we are all part of the civilised world. The 'good' against the 'evil'.
And we believe them, because that's exactly how it is in the movies.
Saddam, bin Laden, Gaddaffi…pussies, the lot of 'em.
It's time to kick ass!
Who benefits?
Let's be honest, the whole thing reeks like a bucket of dung: the more you
stir it, the worse it smells.
Like many people, I sat spellbound in front of the tv - flicking back and
forth between several US News channels - while planes crashed and buildings
crumbled, and as thousands of people tragically lost their lives. The
sensation that 'this is a movie' did not start to subside until a few days
after the attack.
Within minutes of the story breaking, they were talking about Islamic
terrorists and, more precisely, Osama bin Laden. It was all coming thick and
fast; a confusing and horrifying barrage on the senses. For many, it was
like being at the movies, or being caught in a dream. One's sense of reality
suddenly crossed the border into a netherworld where it merged for a while
with that mental state which is usually reserved for fantasy and
entertainment.
I have to admit that as all the chaos was unfolding, and as the only
information I had at my disposal was from the likes of CNN and Sky, I
seriously considered the possibility that this was an attack by Islamic
fundamentalist terrorists, seeking to destabilise the Western world. But
when the follow-up attacks which should have occurred at the height of the
chaos failed to happen - when the real strike should have occurred - I began
to wonder.
I asked the same questions I always do about events on the world stage. I
asked 'who benefits from this', and I asked 'what if we are being told the
opposite of the truth'? What sense will the answers to these questions
reveal about what has happened?
Looking at who benefits, it's all the same old faces and institutions that
this magazine has documented for years, so I will not bore you with too many
details about them. The interconnected names, related subjects and
historical precedents to this are complex and numerous. Anyone new to these
subjects really needs to look at the back-issues of this magazine to see how
it all fits together.
Even so, this article must look at not only the most pertinent factors
involved in the terrorist attack, but also to certain related issues, some
of which do not, at first, seem to bear much relevance - at least
superficially. In order to understand single events such as this it is
imperative to see it in context with the wider picture.
Beyond the 'who', is also the 'what'? Again, to the readers of this
magazine, the answer should be fairly clear.
There is an agenda in place to centralise world power into the hands of the
few through the monopolisation and centralisation of business, politics and
other forms of material power. The 'One World Government', the 'One World
Bank', the 'New World Order'…phrases all too familiar to those who have been
following this unfolding saga.
For years we have been warning about the potential implementation of
fundamental infringements on personal freedom, compulsory microchip Ids for
everyone, collection and storage of information regarding every aspect of
our lives, closer monitoring through electronic media, restrictions on free
speech and protest, erosion of the power of the individual and of the
individually-minded collective, whilst magnifying the power of the select
few in key positions, etc. etc. And more than this, we have been warning
that in order to achieve this, situations need to be manufactured which will
scare us all so much that we will ask for, or even demand, that such
measures are put in place.
It is no coincidence that such measures and more are have been and will be
advanced as a result of the recent attack. Now 'we' are at war - they say.
Fear and paranoia is rampant. But we are not sure who to fear exactly. We
know it's coming from Islamic areas - they say. Although this attack has all
but been officially blamed on Osama bin Laden, they tell us that real enemy
is still essentially 'unseen', thus requiring a planned long-term war - a
'new kind of war' - to eradicate global terrorism.
Fear is always magnified when the source is unknown, or uncertain; and
people in fear are rendered so insecure that they will give up their minds
and freedoms to those who will step forward to guide and protect them.
Over 100 years ago, a document which accurately described the course of the
proceeding century was uncovered. The Protocols of the Learned Elders of
Zion documents with stunning accuracy the techniques subsequently used by
the world controllers in their march towards the establishment of the New
World Order. As I showed in my article Proofs of an Ancient Conspiracy
(Truth Campaign issue 16), the Protocols were not an isolated case of forged
propaganda, originating in pre-Communist Russia, but were merely restating
an agenda which has been documented throughout history since at least the
middle of the first millennium BC when the Law was first laid down in the
book of Deuteronomy:
…seven nations greater and mightier than thou [are to be delivered into the
Judahite's hands], and: Thou shalt utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no
covenant with them…ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their
images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with
fire…for thou art a holy people unto the Lord thy God; the Lord thy God hath
chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are
on the face of the earth…Thou shalt be blessed above all people…And thou
shalt consume all the people which the Lord thy God shall deliver thee;
thine eyes shall have no pity upon them…And he shall deliver their kings
into thine hand, and thou shalt destroy their name from under heaven; there
shall no man be able to stand before thee, until thou have destroyed them…
Thou shalt surely smite the inhabitants of that city with the edge of the
sword, destroying it utterly, and all that is therein…etc.
Furthermore…Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother…unto a stranger
[non-Jew] thou mayest lend upon usury…And all the people of the earth shall
see that thou art called by the name of the Lord; and they shall be afraid
of thee…thou shalt lend unto many nations, and thou shalt not borrow. And
the Lord will make thee the head, and not the tail; and thou shalt be above
only, and thou shalt not be beneath…etc.
These are but a minute fraction of many examples of the nature of the
destructive 'master-race' mentality displayed by these so-called 'men of
God' in but one book in the Old Testament.
The other books of the Torah, written in the wake of Deuteronomy are equally
ominous for the Gentile nations. For example, Exodus 23:22 explicitly states
God's promise to his people:
If thou shalt indeed…do all that I speak, then I will be an enemy unto thine
enemies…and will destroy all the people to whom thou shalt come.
And one of the main observances demanded of God, for which his reward will
be utter destruction of the enemy, was written in Deuteronomy 12:2:
Ye shall utterly destroy all the places, wherein the nations which ye shall
possess served other Gods.
The following is but one of many passages from the Protocols which can be
equally applied to today's political situation:
The intensification of armaments, the increase of police forces - are all
essential for the completion of the aforementioned plans. What we have to
get at is that there should be in all the States of the world, besides
ourselves, only the masses of the proletariat, a few millionaires devoted to
our interests, police and soldiers.
Throughout all Europe, and by means of relations with Europe, in other
continents also, we must create ferments, discords and hostility. Therein we
gain a double advantage. In the first place we keep in check all countries,
for they will know that we have the power whenever we like to create
disorders or to restore order. All these countries are accustomed to see in
us an indispensable force of coercion. In the second place, by our intrigues
we shall tangle up all the threads which we have stretched into the cabinets
of all States by means of the political, by economic treaties, or loan
obligations. In order to succeed in this we must use great cunning and
penetration during negotiations and agreements, but, as regards what is
called the "official language," we shall keep to the opposite tactics and
assume the mask of honesty and complacency. In this way the peoples and
governments of the goyim, whom we have taught to look only at the outside
whatever we present to their notice, will still continue to accept us as the
benefactors and saviours of the human race.
(Protocols 7:1-2)
Terrorism and doublespeak
Xenophobia, especially towards those of Arab descent is rapidly on the
increase. The message from the governments and media is to be vigilant of
strangers; to be suspicious of those we don't know and about whose
backgrounds we are uncertain, as they may be terrorists in our midst.
We have a world of increasing population; a huge proportion of which are not
contributing significantly to the global economy - the globe which is
considered by the self-appointed elite few to be their personal fiefdom -
but instead are consuming and draining the resources of those same elite
few; the elite few who exist to profit from and control the masses. These
unproductive millions are what Bertrand Russell called the 'useless eaters'.
They are concentrated in places like Afghanistan and Pakistan and in other
the Third World areas where there is also a large number of Islamic factions
who have no desire to be part of the 'Western Utopia' which is unfolding
daily in front of our eyes; Islamic factions who refuse to play ball with
the Illuminati's military-industrial complex.
Slowly, over the course of the past century, many of the 'useless' eaters
have been turned into 'useful eaters' through being coerced into providing
cheap labour - often slave labour - for Western-based companies, or have
been diligently raising cash crops to sell cheaply to the West in order to
raise the money needed to pay off loans they were forced to take from the
Western bankers.
Gradually, the independent nations of all races and religions are becoming
serfs to the Western global feudal system - the New World Order.
Today, nations all over the world - even those who oppose the West's
capitalist tyranny, such as the Muslim nations - are binding together in
alliance with the West in a common cause. Such nations and factions which
hitherto posed a real threat to the New World Order agenda have now taken
significant steps to come under the wing of the very same force. The leaders
of such nations - the New World Order puppets - have used the excuse
provided by the terrorist attack to move from being covert agents of the New
World Order to being overt agents. Aided by the threat of war, the people of
such nations have been persuaded to join the One World Government almost
overnight.
The New World Order is eliminating its opposition by intimidation, force and
absorption. The Establishment is very quickly scaring the world into
accepting its agenda. In a great reversal of logic, it is using a deliberate
covert strategy of terror to combat what it overtly describes as 'terrorism'.
For, what is a 'terrorist'?
…a person who uses or favours violent and intimidating methods of coercing a
government or community.
(Concise Oxford Dictionary)
By definition, then, the so-called 'free' Western power bloc has become the
largest terrorist organisation in history. But then, those who have been
keeping abreast of the activities of the New World Order know that already.
And we knew this long before September 11th 2001.
In future, terrorism will be defined purely as actions taken against the New
World Order bloc, whilst 'on-side' terrorism will continue to be classed as
a righteous struggle to protect the 'free' world.
One of the most significant terrorist organisational cells in the New World
Order agenda has been Israel. A state which itself is little more than an
army of occupation created from mass warfare, bloodshed and the violent
imposition of an ancient religious-political agenda known as Zionism.
Zionism has just received a massive boost through recent events in America.
A hundred years ago, the biggest opposition to Zionism and the Judaic agenda
was the Western Christian-based power-bloc. Since that time, the West has
increasingly conceded to the agenda. By simply being part of the so-called
'democratic' West, by voting for our governments, we are effectively
pro-Zionist, whether or not we realise it. And that is how we are seen by
the enemies of Zionism..
Today, the biggest enemy of Zionism is Islam. Israel is 'on-side'. The
US-led coalition is saying 'anyone not with us is against us'. Anyone
threatening the coalition will be an automatic enemy of the 'civilised
world'. The chances of Israel gaining total control over Jerusalem has just
increased many-fold, which is what must be for Zionism to realise its
central aims. In the immediate aftermath of the bombing in America, Israel
began the rhetoric and propaganda campaign to lend their full support to the
USA and took the opportunity to increase their assaults on Palestine in
order to give the clear message that Israel is the USA's closest ally. A
week later, Palestine was called to a cease-fire by Arafat and Israel
responded by doing the same. Of course the newspaper headlines reported that
Israel had declared peace upon Palestine, as though this was an Israeli
initiative. Which all smacks of pro-Israeli propaganda, and the cease-fire
itself is more likely to be a propaganda exercise than an act of respect for
the dead, considering the amount of bloodshed and hatred generated between
the two sides throughout the last century.
Over one hundred years ago, the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
outlined the clear, cold subversive and brutally pragmatic political
methodology which world government is utilising today to steer the direction
of the world:
It must be noted that men with bad instincts are more in number than the
good, and therefore the best results in governing them are attained by
violence and terrorisation, and not by academic discussions. Every man aims
at power, everyone would like to become a dictator if only he could, and
rare indeed are the men who would not be willing to sacrifice the welfare of
all for the sake of securing their own welfare.
What has restrained the beasts of prey who are called men? What has served
for their guidance hitherto?
In the beginnings of the structure of society, they were subjected to brutal
and blind force; afterwards - to Law, which is the same force, only
disguised. I draw the conclusion that by the law of nature right lies in
force.
Political freedom is an idea but not a fact. This idea one must know how to
apply whenever it appears necessary with this bait of an idea to attract the
masses of the people to one's party for the purpose of crushing another who
is in authority. This task is rendered easier if the opponent has himself
been infected with the idea of freedom, so-called liberalism, and, for the
sake of an idea, is willing to yield some of his power. It is precisely here
that the triumph of our theory appears; the slackened reins of government
are immediately, by the law of life, caught up and gathered together by a
new hand, because the blind might of the nation cannot for one single day
exist without guidance, and the new authority merely fits into the place of
the old already weakened by liberalism.
(Protocol 1:3-6)
So does this mean that the completion of the Judaic agenda or the Christian
Apocalypse, through mass bloodshed, is upon us? Consider the following:
Our State, marching along the path of peaceful conquest, has the right to
replace the horrors of war by less noticeable and more satisfactory
sentences of death, necessary to maintain the terror which tends to produce
blind submission. Just but merciless severity is the greatest factor of
strength in the State: not only for the sake of gain but also in the name of
duty, for the sake of victory, we must keep to the programme of violence and
make-believe. The doctrine of squaring accounts is precisely as strong as
the means of which it makes use. Therefore it is not so much by the means
themselves as by the doctrine of severity that we shall triumph and bring
all governments into subjection to our super-government. It is enough for
them to know that we are too merciless for all disobedience to cease.
(Protocol 1:24)
Realistically, there should be no apocalyptic war. The West is far too
powerful. We have enormous destructive capabilities and technologies which
dwarfs those of the Islamic world. We only need to remember the so-called
'war' in Iraq in the '90s to see with what ease even a major Arab power can
be defeated. It all depends on how protracted the elite want it to be. This
could potentially be ideal for the eugenics operation, to trim back on the
'useless eaters' and to end the opposition to the Zionist Illuminati agenda
once and for all.
To triumph, the Illuminati agenda must keep us all in a state of fear, and
the means to do this is through the fear of the perceived enemy - real or
imagined. Just as in George Orwell's 1984, it is not so much the direct
military power of the State, but more the imagined unseen terror which lurks
behind every unknown face, which keeps the masses subservient to the
government; to the point where the people actually come to fully embrace the
ideals of their masters who are those very unseen terrorists themselves:
It is from us that the all-engulfing terror proceeds. We have in our service
persons of all opinions, of all doctrines, restoring monarchists,
demagogues, socialists, communists and utopian dreamers of every kind. We
have harnessed them all to the task: each one of them on his own account is
boring away at the last remnants of authority, is striving to overthrow all
established form of order. By these acts all States are in torture; they
exhort to tranquillity, are ready to sacrifice everything for peace: but we
will not give them peace until they openly acknowledge our international
Super-Government, and with submissiveness.
(Protocol 9:4)
Of course, there is more to this than Zionism. At the end of the day it is
all about power and control funnelled into fewer and fewer hands. There are
plenty of individuals who want to be on the winning side, whatever religion,
race or creed should 'triumph'. It is a sickness in the very core
consciousness of man. A survival instinct gone cancerous. We need to see it
as a common problem, to which religious and political agendas are mere
symptoms and tools used to manifest domination of the masses by the
self-selected elite few.
I think the most likely outcome of this will be less of an out and out
global war, but more of an excuse to clamp down in the areas of freedom and
to implement massive centralisation of power; to tidy up loose ends and
restrict or disable individual and organised resistance to the New World
Order programme. The elite don't want an apocalyptic war. Things are going
too well for them as it is. But they do need massive propaganda
(mind-control) opportunities which they have an excuse to back by force,
preferably with the general support of the masses.
Wars are extremely profitable to the economies of the winning side. The
winning side is always the Illuminati. The major global banks never lose.
They loan countries of both sides of the conflict enormous amounts of money
to arm themselves and they keep those countries afloat for as long as deemed
necessary during times of crisis. When the war is over, the victorious side
is left with staggering debt to the international banks, whilst the defeated
side is left with reparations. Finally, both sides are left with a need to
take loans from the same banks to rebuild their countries and economies.
Another interesting question to ask is 'who does not benefit?'
Who does not benefit?
Apart from the thousands of grieving families across the world, whose lives
have been shattered by this wanton slaughter, and all people of the world
whose freedoms are further eroded, perhaps the most significant factor in
this whole examination is that those who supposedly carried out the attack,
have benefited least.
It is certainly not to the benefit of the Islamic world, whether extremist
fundamentalist or not. The overwhelming condemnation and almost global unity
which was inevitable following such an attack will make it impossible for an
Islamic victory against Western capitalist states. No-one has yet come forth
to proclaim responsibility or to state the cause for which the terrorists
willingly laid down their lives. So ultimately, there is very little logical
sense in a religious or political terrorist organisation carrying it out in
the first place. Are we supposed to believe that people will willingly
sacrifice themselves to a cause and not proclaim that cause; not take the
opportunity of having the entire world's attention; to remain silent - even
deny it?
We are certainly supposed to take for granted that Islamic terrorists are
wholly responsible for this. In the few days following the disaster, the US
news reported that the date of the attack is highly significant to Islamic
terrorists because it fell on the 31st anniversary, to the day, of the first
major airline terrorist hijack in which 3 planes from TWA, Swissair and BOAC
had been hijacked by Arafat's Palestinian Liberation Organisation activists.
The event and the organisation it spawned became known as Black September.
So someone was making the point very strongly that we should be looking
towards Islamic terrorists, from the outset.
Still, nobody from the Islamic world has admitted responsibility for the
recent attacks. How curious to set up all the signals, and yet refuse to
take the opportunity to publicise their cause to the entire world!
In the early '70s, the CIA had its own agent as chief of intelligence in the
PLO, named Ali Hassan Salameh, as well as the covert support of Arafat. Are
we expected to believe that intelligence gathering and spying has so
crumbled since then that we were so unprepared for the recent attack in
America?
However, all is not as it would appear. The hijacking of the planes actually
occurred on September 6th and were blown up on September 12th.
Why was the media making the point that September 11th was such a
significant day to Palestinian terrorists? Was it just concocted to ensure
that people would look no further than Islamic extremists and consider no
other option; to ensure that our minds would already be well and truly made
up at the earliest possible opportunity, in order to avoid anyone
considering any other options? The 'enemy' was effectively identified and
served up on a plate by the media before the world had time to recover from
the traumatic shock of what had just occurred - the point at which minds are
far more easily manipulated than in times of peace and security - when we
were still dissociating from reality because of the traumatisation of our
minds!
The lying did not end there. Fox News, on their website, were keen to draw
parallels with Islamic terrorism in an article entitled, 'September
Anniversary of Several Past Attacks, Events', which reported that:
September marks the anniversary of several noted political events and
terrorist attacks.
On Sept. 11, 1922, a British mandate was proclaimed in Palestine, despite
Arab protests. It lasted until 1948, after the United Nations authorized a
partition of the territory and the state of Israel was established.
Again, this simply is not true. The mandate was basically an official policy
recognising 'grounds for reconstituting their national home in that
country'. It was approved by the Council of the League of Nations on July
24th 1922, having spent years on the drawing board. The date at which the
mandate actually came into force was September 29th.
Fox News also just happens to be part of a larger media empire which
includes 20th Century Fox, the very company which produced such
propaganda/mind control exercises as the movie Independence Day.
Let us consider what the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion have to say
about the covert use of the Press:
In the hands of the States of to-day there is a great force that creates the
movement of thought in the people, and that is the Press. The part played by
the Press is to keep pointing out requirements supposed to be indispensable,
to give voice to the complaints of the people, to express and to create
discontent. It is in the Press that the triumph of freedom of speech finds
its incarnation. But the goyim States have not known how to make use of this
force; and it has fallen into our hands. Through the Press we have gained
the power to influence while remaining ourselves in the shade; thanks to the
Press we have got the gold in our hands, notwithstanding that we have had to
gather it out of the oceans of blood and tears. But it has paid us, though
we have sacrificed many of our people. Each victim on our side is worth in
the sight of God a thousand goyim. (my emphasis)
(Protocol 2:5)
We must compel the governments of the goyim to take action in the direction
favoured by our widely conceived plan, already approaching the desired
consummation, by what we shall represent as public opinion, secretly
promoted by us through the means of that so-called "Great Power" - the Press
which, with few exceptions that may be disregarded, is already, entirely in
our hands.
(Protocol 7:5)
In other words, what the press expresses as public opinion, becomes public
opinion and is orchestrated that way to implement the desires of the hidden
hand which pulls the strings from behind the scenes. The same can be said
for the tv and movie propaganda created in the form of 'entertainment'.
Inconsistencies abound
The Islamic world faces a potentially catastrophic retaliation from the West
and its Allies. The suicide attack on New York and Washington could very
probably be a suicide attack by many thousands of Muslims, who will
ultimately also suffer the consequences of the actions of these supposedly
extremist few.
What kind of terrorist or 'freedom fighter' deliberately carries out an
operation which they know will lead to the exact opposite outcome of that
which they profess to be fighting for? What kind of religious or political
terrorist, opposing the Zionist Illuminist Capitalist One World Government
hands over the perfect opportunity to them to have carte blanche to impose
everything it has ever dreamed about imposing, which includes wiping out
themselves in the process?
Furthermore, given the scale of the operation and the opportunity for mass
destruction and disruption of the West which was presented to these
terrorists, why didn't they do any more than they did?
Certainly the US and the Western economy has been disrupted, for a short
while at least, but why was the target in New York only the World Trade
Centre?
Why did they not destroy Wall Street? If they wished to plunge the Western
economy and the Zionist banking system into chaos, why did they hit the WTC
and leave the hub of the banking world untouched?
Could the answer be that the operation was not intended to cause maximum
chaos, nor even masterminded by those outside the West? Only that it should
appear so?
I think we have to be courageous enough and open-minded enough to consider
this very real possibility.
Consider elements in the run-up to this event. Until a few years ago I, as I
am sure many people did, thought that racial and religious tensions here and
around the world had receded somewhat. Certainly racially motivated events
in this country had not been headline news for a long time. Then suddenly,
especially after the Stephen Lawrence affair, the race issue was everywhere
in the newspapers and on tv. Increasing numbers of reports of
racially-connected events - riots, common assault, murders and bombings -
began pouring from our screens. Not only that, but simultaneously, the tv
was inundated with programmes about Nazis, warfare, disasters, the Holocaust
etc. etc. Programmes shown recently such as Jon Ronson's Secret Rulers of
the World took every opportunity to link anti-New World Order sentiments and
activism with extreme right-wing Nazism and especially with what they call
'anti-Semitism'. The fear of being associated with such taboo organisations
is enough to keep most people from openly expressing their opinions, and is
a convenient tool used by the masses to police themselves by denouncing and
ostracising the outspoken few.
A year ago, the Arab-Israeli conflict escalated when renewed Middle East
aggressions created an opportunity for the extremist Jew Ariel Sharon to
become head of his nation. Since which time, conflict between Palestinians
and Israelis - Muslims and Jews - has escalated.
At the same time, we in Britain were prepared for an emergency situation and
overt militarisation of our land by the Foot and Mouth crisis which was
manipulated into being and further manipulated to maximise the amount of
fear and disruption, as well as the mental agitation and trauma which has
ensued. All of which has created the atmosphere of preparedness for
increased control, loss of freedoms and acceptance of a visible military
presence, where previously we had expected to see none.
Britain, though shocked into submission by the foot and mouth crisis had, by
this point, already made significant in-roads towards the Orwellian
nightmare of the police state. Increasing draconian laws have been aided for
a long time by the media-led call for massive numbers of surveillance
cameras on the streets of our cities and towns - as a response to increasing
propaganda in the media highlighting the fear of crime. The idea of mass
surveillance as a good thing has subtly been popularised by voyeuristic
television 'fly-on-the-wall' documentaries and game shows such as the
enormously popular Big Brother.
What was once considered to be a futuristic nightmare feared by the masses
is now a reality desired by the masses. The next stage in Britain is planned
to be the introduction of compulsory ID cards, more surveillance etc.
And on and on it goes.
Pavlovian reactions
Despite the fact that the Islam terrorist issue is all about Zionism and the
West's (especially America's) support and aid for Zionism, the media remains
almost silent about this issue.
I am writing this article a week after the attack on America and I have yet
to see one news programme or documentary discussing the issue of Zionism!
As usual, we need to consider what they are not telling you, as much as what
they are.
No doubt, people expressing such views as I have here will be seen as
'traitors' by some. Links will immediately start firing in the minds of the
programmed masses between expressing these views and Nazism, anti-Semitism,
racism, anti-Americanism - 'dangerous subversives' and 'mad conspiracy
theorists' the lot of us. And that is exactly how the majority have been
programmed to react.
Interestingly, the programmed preconception in recent years, in Britain, has
been that those waving flags and proclaiming a pride in British culture,
were associated with such subversiveness in the programmed minds of so many
British people. Which has always been an entirely bizarre attitude,
considering that, at the same time, we have been encouraged to accept other
cultures, learn about them, respect them and see us all as 'one' people.
Ethnic carnivals, religious celebrations, 'black pride', 'Native American
wisdom' etc. have been very trendy and 'right on' in recent times. Of
course, there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. Other cultures have a
great deal to teach us and the more we know about each other, the better we
can communicate and truly understand our common humanity and respect our
differences. However, there is a common unconscious perception that it's
okay and right to extol the virtues of other races and cultures and their
religions, whilst being suspicious and prejudiced against those extolling
being white or celebrating white culture. Such illogical attitudes - which
is almost a kind of self-loathing - are manipulated states of mind which can
be used to control the masses in uncertain times such as these.
While current conflict lasts, as it did in the previous wars and conflicts,
and as it is currently in America, patriotism will be extolled. Racial
hatred against Arabs will be tolerated - at least by many British people, if
not by 'officialdom'. Intolerance will be tolerated. Though, because the
plan appears to get the Islamic world on-side, we could also see an increase
in calls for racial tolerance and integration etc. as a result of inevitable
racial and religious unrest - overplayed to the extreme to further the
agenda. In war time, sudden reversals of attitudes and new Pavlovian
reactions occur, as the masses react to the provided stimuli that is
carefully engineered by the world's elite. That is how quickly and easily
minds and attitudes can be changed depending on the deliberately - but
superficially - shifting focus of the New World Order agenda.
By even hinting that Zionism may have played a central role in this whole
affair, one may be condemned by reflex action in the eyes of the 'civilised
world'. In such times as these, by criticising one's 'ally', one becomes the
'enemy'. But we must be honest and courageous enough to speak the truth
openly, or things will never change.
It is so mind-bogglingly easy to control the masses through such propaganda!
Preparation
We have we been deliberately prepared, for many years, through the media,
movies and orchestrated dirty tricks campaigns, for the moment when the
'great and the good' would step forward to defeat the 'evil in our midst'.
Events such as these always follow a period of psychological manipulation.
For example, the hugely successful movie Independence Day contained so many
of the overt and subliminal factors we have recently witnessed in the
terrorist bombing and its aftermath:
The world is threatened by alien terrorists. For ET terrorists, read
non-Western alien terrorists. An unknown force from 'outside' managed to
strike from within. These were subliminal archetypes of what actually
unfolded.
The attack was sudden and unexpected, plunging the 'civilised' world - as
represented by New York and Washington - into a burning chaos.
The strikes came from the sky and resulted in spectacular explosions,
destroying well-known world-famous landmarks.
The scenes move from New York to Washington.
The movie includes a direct hit on the Whitehouse; something which was
initially feared to be a target. As in the movie, the Whitehouse was
evacuated. Although the movie focussed on the strikes on America, the aliens
were also off-screen - striking the entire world at the key capital cities;
thus necessitating a global unification, a joint offensive against the
enemy, which is exactly what has been called for and implemented following
the terrorist attack on America. Subliminally, we have been led to react by
associating an attack on the US with an attack on the whole world. Of course
this has been facilitated by choosing a target in which thousands of
individuals from over thirty countries worked every day.
Who ultimately pulled off the operation as leader of the 'free world'? The
President of the USA - the superman of the piece; entirely honest, brave and
upstanding. How like the media portrayal of GW Bush.
There are also further subliminal elements in this movie worthy of mention.
Such as, who provided the 'spiritual' guidance? It is the Jewish father who
conducts a Jewish prayer session, done in Hebrew. Not a Christian or Muslim,
Hindu or whatever else religious/spiritual message is played in the movie
(with the exception of a brief Christian wedding scene). When one of the
attendees points out that he is not Jewish, the message he receives from the
Jew is that 'nobody's perfect'. Rather than what we would have expected from
the archetypal Christian, which would have been something like, 'it doesn't
matter, God loves all His children, no matter what faith', we get typical
Judaic religious bigotry and racial/religious supremacy, passed off as
humour (according to Judaism God is purely a Jewish deity and only Jews are
the chosen ones, while the Gentiles will eventually be enslaved and ruled by
the 'chosen' at Yahweh's chosen time).
In the movie, who saved the day? The New York Jewish American
super-intelligent boffin, interestingly named David Levinson - i.e. David
'son of Levi' - clearly a name with loaded ancient Judaic messianic
significance.
Considering that Jews make up only approximately 3% of Americans, the
Hollywood movie/propaganda machine and interconnected News media machine is
overwhelmingly controlled by Jewish magnates, producers and media moguls.
Key positions in the US Administration have been dominated by Jews,
Clinton's Administration in particular was noteworthy for being almost
entirely Jewish. Their portrayal of Muslims and their pro-Zionist propaganda
is hardly surprising therefore.
If the British political parties were comprised on 90%-plus Asians, or any
other particular non-British racial or religious grouping, I am sure the
British people would have something to say about unfair representation of
interests in Parliament. But strangely nobody seems to bat an eyelid about a
small minority interest being the vast majority controlling body in US
politics.
Unsurprisingly then, in Independence Day, like 99.9% of the American movies
which serve as propaganda and mind control tools for the Illuminati, there
was no Muslim hero or victim portrayed. More often than not, the Muslim - if
represented at all in a major movie - will be portrayed as the bad guy,
usually the terrorist, such as in major Hollywood movies as True Lies, The
Siege, Executive Decision…etc. (the latter of these were, incidentally
produced with the co-operation of the Defence Department of the USA).
Another main hero of the movie is the black American pilot. This is a man
who is first seen in bed with a single mother who is also a stripper. The
subliminal message here being, the best people are unmarried single parents
who work in sleazy jobs. There is only one normal married couple portrayed
in the entire movie, the President and his wife (who is dead by the end of
the movie anyway). The Protocols and Talmud are very clear about the hatred
of Christianity. The Protocols express a plan to erode Christian nations to
destabilise the (once) Christian Western world and replace (once) strongly
held Christian values with ultra-liberalism, drunkenness and what was then
defined as general degeneracy. Nowhere is this more obvious than in the
Soviet Union, where the most popular teatime show is a no-holds barred
uncensored run down of the day's traumatic deaths, interspersed by naked
weather girls, whilst alcoholism is at an all-time high, the porn industry
is enormous and the country is largely run by gangsters, some of whom are in
official government positions. However, such deliberate decimation of
culture is also to be seen having been inflicted upon many non-Christian
cultures such as the indigenous American, African and Australian peoples.
The white American 'have a go hero' farmer interestingly played a vital role
in the victory by making a suicide aeroplane assault on the alien ship,
thereby facilitating the 'good guys' in their fight against 'evil' enemies
from beyond. He too is a single parent, this time the father of several
mixed race children, and is also a drunk.
These are the new types of role models in the New World Order.
The point I am making here is not that it is wrong to be single, unmarried,
black, Jewish or a stripper etc. per se. Rather that unrealistic scenes are
repeatedly portrayed as the norm, and in this case the norm for the best of
us - the heroes, the role models we aspire to. It is a message which is
constantly preached by the entertainment media, and we have to consider just
why this is?
Like the movie Pearl Harbour, special and disproportional efforts are made
to push forward the racial elements in the stories. Pearl Harbour in
particular - being supposedly an account of real events - is guilty of
misrepresentation, over-emphasis and over-sentimentalisation of the racial
issues it portrays and has been widely criticised for it. Whereas
Independence Day, which as a work of fiction can hardly be criticised as
such, has barely a scene in the movie involving more than one person in
which Jews and black people and those of mixed race are not involved. Again,
this is not to highlight anything being wrong with being black or of mixed
race etc., it is to highlight the relentless promotion - overt and covert -
of the 'norm' society which does not actually exist, but which is being
created in the West and around the world.
Why is this significant? Firstly, as I said, there are conspicuously no
Muslims, when in fact there are hundreds of thousands of Muslims in New York
alone. Moreover, having become a multicultural and multiracial Western world
which is enormously different from the Europe and America which existed a
century ago, the elite can use this as a weapon. The cry 'we are all One
World now' cannot be contested. And One World requires a One World
Government. Thus multiculturalism and multiracialism, as it is being
manipulated to be (rather than as it would naturally develop otherwise), is
a great tool for the New World Order agenda. As we have seen many times,
criticism of the New World Order is easily turned around by the likes of the
ADL and JDL etc. to racial and religious issues, whereby those exposing the
agenda are accused of being racists and bigots, anti-Semites and Nazis etc.
No doubt, many people reading this now will have automatically reacted in
self-righteous indignation at what they think I have just said and will now
be denouncing me as a 'racist bigot' and 'anti-Semite'. Already the inner
predators and the decades of Illuminati programming will be distorting what
they have read, firing up all kinds of emotional responses. To those people,
I suggest you re-read what you think you have read and see how easy it is to
be programmed.
Just to be sure the message permeates the predators, let me say that I have
no hatred towards people because of their racial or religious background. I
do not blame non-indigenous peoples for settling in other countries in order
to try and establish a better life for themselves and their families.
Neither do I class others as inferior or less worthy, based upon their race
or religion.
The artificial promotion of the multiracial and multicultural society by the
hidden government is not a matter of altruism or philanthropy. It is used to
increase the proportion of 'minorities' in an indigenous society in order to:
gradually erode the indigenous culture and any strengths it may have had in
its pure state - which is also the what happens to those ethnic cultures
that establish themselves in another land. Gradually, the various cultures
living in close proximity will become largely homogenised into a single
culture. In the intermediate stages differences are still very much
apparent, however, and can be manipulated to: divide and conquer through
orchestrating racial and religious tensions into opposing sides which can be
played off against each other, having also served to: erode national and
religious loyalties, which are so divided between non-indigenous races and
religions that any national united opposition to the NWO agenda is
significantly diminished. Eventually, as well as a single world government
and currency, there will emerge a single world religion which will unify the
current religions and unite the world's opposing religious factions.
Perhaps most pertinent to the current situation: artificially cultivated
multiracialism facilitates the ease with which foreign subversives can be
planted inside a country to destabilise it to the advantage of another
country or an alien religious or political movement. This is exactly how
Judaism and Zionism has risen to world dominance since the spread of the
organisation from Eastern Europe to Western Europe and into the US, where it
is now disproportionately a majority power-bloc. Thus is enabled the
placement of agents in positions of power - often as apparent
representatives of their own ethnic group - whilst in fact representing
primarily their own branch of the NWO - different appearances, same agenda.
The agenda of multiracialism and multiculturalism is perhaps one of the
aspects of the agenda which is most difficult to understand and accept.
Having been born into such a world, it is taken as the norm. People in
general don't think beyond their own time and impose their current values
upon other times, if they do consider them at all. They therefore fail to
appreciate that this time is not the product of a natural evolution of
freedom-loving 'good' overcoming the 'evil' of the past; it is the product
of a war of attrition on the minds of the masses by a manipulative coalition
of many generations of a self-appointed elite.
This agenda has been operating not for a few generations, but for thousands
of years. It advances almost imperceptibly slowly, therefore; except at
times such as the present, when the agenda becomes more apparent. The same
agenda outlined in the Protocols of subverting nation states was also
written in the Jewish Torah and has been in operation for at least 2,500
years. By small steps are great journeys made.
Gradually, the world has become a collective of states in the New World
Order, led by British and American 'imperialism', which eventually dissolves
into multiculturalism, whereby Western capitalist business can be easily
established in those countries that now rely on their 'allies' and business
counterparts for economic stability. Military and political alliances are
forged and strengthened. Coalitions such as the EU, NATO etc. are created
and eventually a single power bloc emerges from what used to be independent
nation states. Any states left outside of this 'great beast' are then
intimidated, bombed, terrorised into submission, or are economically
disadvantaged or isolated and therefore are forced into a merger with the
rapidly emerging single World Government.
Recent events in America are the direct result of the ancient agenda of
subversive globalisation and the destabilisation of nation states, their
cultures and their leadership.
The goal is to have a single World State, peopled by individuals of a single
culture, economy, religion and politic. The future Utopian state will be
much as HG Wells predicted in his novel The Time Machine. A world populated
by shiny happy docile people living an ideal lifestyle without a single
original thought in their heads, who read no books and have no idea of their
true history; and who are entirely unaware that below their feet they are
being farmed as food for the elite controllers who stay out of sight, hiding
in the shadows. These elite creatures - called Morlocks in the novel - are
parasites who have mind controlled the shiny happy ignorant population -
conditioned them - to respond to the signal on cue and offer themselves
willingly to their hidden 'gods'.
Race and religion are major tools of the Illuminati and it is imperative
that we understand these issues in order to appreciate the bigger picture.
It is purely such manipulation of these issues by those who wish to control
others that I am highlighting here. Being of another ethnic origin does not
make one inferior to a person who is white and vice versa. We are simply
different that is all - we are One family made up of children many different
personalities. We should respect and appreciate our differences. Unthinking
programmed ultra-liberals, radicals, politicians, 'trendies' etc. who insist
we all conform to the idea that we are 'all the same' are insulting the
respective indigenous cultures and races of the world and are playing right
into the hands of the Illuminati. Neither does one have to be a racist or
anti-Semite, or hate anyone to appreciate one's own culture or race or
nation, if that is what one wishes to do. Neither do we have to conform to
racial or religious stereotypes, if that is our choice. But we must be sure
that our choices are actually our own, and come from an informed basis,
rather than being implanted by mass propaganda.
Following the Jewish faith does not mean you are a willing agent of the New
World Order agenda. People will often be automatically drawn into siding
with 'their own' organisations, unaware of how they are simply supporting
the New World Order agenda. This way, a manipulated racial or religious
'problem' will gain large support from those particular communities and the
desired pre-planned 'solutions' will be easily implemented with mass
support. Exactly this has occurred in the USA, following the attack, wherein
masses of Americans who have previously criticised the President, or simply
did not care very much either way about US politics are now waving their
flags and yelling their support for the current government and its policies.
The majority of Jewish people are as manipulated as anyone else, and by the
same force as everyone else. We mustn't forget how willing the Zionists are
to sacrifice their own in the belief that the 'end justifies the means'.
Christians and Muslims are no exceptions when it comes to being sacrificed
and manipulated by those who bear the appearance of being 'one of us'. Just
look at how Jewish, Muslim and Christian leaders all over the world have
pledged support to the US recently, despite some of them being previously -
at least officially - opposed to the US and its policies.
It's time to step outside of the conditioning and put aside the false taboos
and 'politically correct' shackles of the mind. Our attitudes and decisions
must be based on truth and information shared openly and lovingly.
We are watching a movie, people. We are watching actors on a world stage.
The constant media propaganda subliminally programmes us to accept the One
World agenda and makes us fearful of criticising it. So powerful is it that
it can turn us against ourselves to the point where we will fight against
our own best interests to uphold causes which are little more than
illusions. It paints a false picture of reality and repeats it over and over
again, until that image is actually manifest as reality. The attitudes and
behaviours portrayed on the screen become the attitudes and behaviours
expressed by the masses.
Art imitating life? Or deliberately manipulated art creating reality to
ancient religious and political agendas?
Vested interests
Independence Day is just one example of how much subliminal programming we
are exposed to by the 'entertainment' media. A comprehensive list of
examples would take many pages.
Considering how controlled Hollywood is by Jews, it is not surprising that
there is a severe lack of Islam in the movies, except to portray Muslims as
the 'bad guys'. The following is a brief overview of just how Jewish US
movie and entertainment industry is, consider the following (although the
following lists may be a few years out of date, they serve well enough to
make the general point):
The Walt Disney Company, is the largest movie corporation. Chairman and CEO
is Michael Eisner,
The Disney empire includes several television production companies: Walt
Disney Television, Touchstone Television, Buena Vista Television), its own
cable network with 14 million subscribers, and two video production companies.
The Walt Disney Picture Group is headed by Joe Roth and includes Touchstone
Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, and Caravan Pictures, Miramax Films (run by
the Weinstein brothers).
In addition to TV and movies, the corporation owns Disneyland, Disney World,
Epcot Center, Tokyo Disneyland, and Euro Disney.
AOL/Time Warner, Inc. The chairman of the board and CEO is Gerald M. Levin.
Time Warner's subsidiary HBO is the country's largest pay-TV cable network.
Viacom Inc. is headed by Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstein). It
produces and distributes TV programs for the three largest networks, owns 12
television stations and 12 radio stations. It produces feature films through
Paramount Pictures, headed by Sherry Lansing; and also owns Blockbuster
video stores.
Viacom's publishing division includes Prentice Hall, Simon & Schuster, and
Pocket Books.
Viacom is also the world's largest provider of cable programming, through
its Showtime, MTV, Nickelodeon, and other networks.
Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation, owns Fox Television Network and 20th
Century Fox Films. Murdoch is a Gentile, but Peter Chernin, who heads
Murdoch's film studio and also oversees his TV production, is a Jew.
The Japanese Sony Corporation, whose U.S. subsidiary, Sony Corporation of
America, is run by Michael Schulhof. Alan J. Levine heads the Sony Pictures
division.
New World Entertainment is owned by Ronald Perelman, who also owns Revlon
cosmetics. The chairman at New World, is Brandon Tartikoff - formerly head
of entertainment programming at NBC.
DreamWorks SKG is run by David Geffen, former Disney Pictures chairman
Jeffrey Katzenberg, and film director Steven Spielberg.
MCA and Universal Pictures, are both owned by Seagram Company Ltd. The
president and CEO of Seagram, the liquor giant, is Edgar Bronfman, Jr., who
is also president of the World Jewish Congress.
Disney, Warner Brothers, Sony, Paramount (Viacom), and Universal (Seagram)
accounted for 74 percent of the total box-office receipts for the year to
date (August 1995).
As is the case with Hollywood, so it is with American news media. Consider
the following:
American Broadcasting Companies (ABC), Columbia Broadcasting System (CBS),
and National Broadcasting Company (NBC) are all controlled by Leonard Harry
Goldenson and staffed all the way down by hand-picked Jews.
The Newhouse media empire owns 31 daily newspapers, including Cleveland
Plain Dealer, the Newark Star-Ledger, and the New Orleans Times-Picayune;
the nation's largest trade book publishing conglomerate, Random House, with
all its subsidiaries; Newhouse Broadcasting, consisting of 12 television
broadcasting stations and 87 cable-TV systems, including some of the
countries largest cable networks-the Sunday supplement Parade, with a
circulation of more than 22 million copies per week; some two dozen major
magazines, including the New Yorker, Vogue, Madamoiselle, Glamour, Vanity
Fair, HQ, Bride's, Gentlemen's Quarterly, Self, Home & Garden....etc.
The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Daily News and the
Washington Post (run by Katherine Meyer Graham) are all Jewish controlled.
Time under AOL/Time Warner - see above), Newsweek (run by the Washington
Post), and U.S. News & World Report (owned and published by Mortimer B
Zucherman) are the most significant US news magazines.
The three largest book publishers: Random House, Simon & Schuster, and Time
Inc. are owned or controlled by Jews
Western Publishing has more than 50 per cent of the children's book market.
Its chairman and CEO is Richard Bernstein.
The White House press secretary Ari Fleischer is also a Jew.
Surely such monopoly on politics, news media and entertainment by such a
minority is ludicrous? Of course it is. But then, it's a ludicrous world,
isn't it?
Religious hypocrisy
In its state of media-manipulated trauma, the world has handed over its mind
and heart to the World Government and is asking it to impose its agenda. We
have given George W Bush power beyond measure. The man who was raised for
the post of US President from the start. A man so deeply damaged by his
upbringing - like so many presidents and officials - that he should be in
therapy - certainly not leader of the so-called 'free world'. 'Dubya' is the
product of a long chain of paedophiles, murderers, war-mongers, mind
controllers, and yes, terrorists.
The religious world is no exception when it comes to mass manipulation. Many
Muslims are now calling for a so-called 'holy war' and are playing straight
into the hands of the pro-Zionist Illuminati. The Christian nations, rather
than extolling the peaceful message of Jesus, are at the forefront of the
cry for revenge (often disguised as a cry to destroy 'evil') - paying mere
lip-service to the central tenets of the message given by the 'Prince of
Peace'.
I was intrigued to see the so-called 'Christian' memorial service at St
Paul's Cathedral on Friday 14th of September. The final hymn to be sung was
'The Battle Hymn of the Republic', following which, the Archbishop (with an
impressively straight face) told the congregation to 'go in peace'. What
amazingly monumental hypocrisy!!! Subliminal programming for the masses.
'Glory glory Hallelujah.' Reminds me of the old wartime song, 'Praise the
Lord and Pass the Ammunition'. The propaganda is in full swing: overt and
covert. Even the Queen managed to squeeze out a few tears on cue. 'God save
our gracious queen', came next. If there is one person on this earth who is
less likely to need saving, then I couldn't name them.
However, I was heartened somewhat by the fact that what appeared to be half
of the congregation at St Paul's did not take part in singing the Battle
Hymn. Many seemed rightly confused and uncomfortable by the occasion. They
were there to pay their respects, seek guidance and a message of hope and
peace in their chosen religion, but were instead being coerced into raising
their voices in praise of a 'righteous' 'holy' war. Just one example of how
opposing sides can be manipulated into the same destructive mindset.
The phrase, 'Crusade against terrorism', has already been used by the
Western alliance. Are we really going to repeat the Crusades all over again?
It would seem so, given the attitude of the US government in their desire to
attack not only the terrorist organisations themselves, but also anyone who
they decide has allied with them. Are we going to witness another mass
slaughter in the name of the Lord?
How similar to the attitude of the Catholic hordes who slaughtered the
Cathars during the Albigensian Crusade under the cry, 'Kill them all. God
will know his own!'
Afghanistan is not the Taliban. The Taliban are an extremist terrorist
occupying power in Afghanistan. The people of Afghanistan are living under
desperate conditions and constant fear as the result of wave after wave of
terrorism and warfare against them stretching back into history. Many are
starving, weak, depressed and desperate. And yet, the West has planned
military action against Afghanistan under the excuse that it is going to
take out the Taliban and their leaders, who are unlikely to be there when
they arrive.
And who is it within the US government that are calling for severe
retaliatory action? While Secretary of State Colin Powell is at pains to
urge restraint and care, his (Jewish) Deputy Secretary of State Paul
Wolfowitz has been calling for early wide-ranging strikes against numerous
targets across the Middle east and in Asia, including Iraq. US (Jewish)
Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld was described by one official as
looking like 'something out of Nightmare on Elm Street. Rumsfeld's policy on
the invasion of Afghanistan is quite clear, and his attitude to the whole
affair could perhaps be gleaned from his statement: 'I think of this in the
sense of self defence, and there is nothing that inhibits the United States
of America from defending itself.'
In Britain, Blair's foreign policy advisor just happens to be Sir David
Manning, once ambassador to Israel and NATO. Whilst British Ambassador to
Washington is Sir Christopher Meyer.
Keep stirring the bucket of dung and before long even the least sensitive of
noses must detect the stench.
Lies and spin
Don't expect the media to proportionally represent the anti-war pro-peace
sentiments which so many of us have, though. The media machine, in times of
war, is primarily a propaganda tool to programme the mass psyche in the
direction intended by the elite.
Who can forget the CNN newsreel of a handful Palestinians celebrating the
news that America had been hit by a terrorist attack, which was aired within
hours of the event? Undoubtedly, this single piece of footage, played over
and over again, caused great distress and anger at the entire Islamic world
at the point at which the world was in a state of mental trauma and turmoil.
Jonathan Dimbleby chaired a debate on ITV that same week and asked a
Palestinian representative about what she thought of the scenes shown on tv
of 'thousands' of Palestinians celebrating the strike on America.
They say 'truth is the first casualty of war', and this charade was no
exception.
Firstly, the scenes shown on tv were not of 'thousands' of celebrating
Palestinians. That was the only such footage to be aired, over and over
again, thereby magnifying the impact and creating the illusion that there
were thousands of demonstrators. Secondly, there was absolutely no evidence
within that footage that these people were specifically celebrating the
attacks on the US.
Most chillingly, however, it appears that the newsreel was not even shot
that day!
I recalled part of the newsreel, but could not place it, until I saw a story
reported on the internet that someone had saved news footage of the 1991
invasion of Kuwait. The report stated that this same news footage was
broadcast then, and the Palestinians filmed were in fact celebrating the
arrival of the Allied troops at the beginning of the Gulf War. (I have yet
to confirm this and would appreciate it if anyone has any firm evidence that
this is the case.)
True or not, such deception by the major News Media should not surprise us.
There are plenty of precedents. Prior to the Gulf war, fake news footage had
been released for the very same reason: to whip up the masses against the
identified 'enemy'. Stories of abandoned premature babies left on floors,
while incubators were looted by Iraqi troops etc. was guaranteed to send
your average American into a state of vengeful hysteria. But it was later
revealed to be nothing more than pure invented secret-government-backed
media propaganda. The 'nurse' who reported this was discovered to have been
none other than the daughter of the Kuwaiti Ambassador to the US.
Setting up the scapegoat
Other propaganda techniques have been used recently also. One Intelligence
ploy which was notably once used to set up Lee Harvey Oswald for the murder
of John F Kennedy seems to have been played in this current situation. The
technique is to set up staged events immediately prior to the main event
involving those who will later be blamed, in order to ensure that plenty of
evidence is available to pin the blame directly and quickly on whomsoever
the Establishment has pre-decided should be the scapegoat.
In Oswald's case, he was 'seen' prior to the JFK assassination in various
places acting suspiciously and provocatively in order that key witnesses
would later be able to easily identify him as buying equipment and shouting
his mouth off concerning his political views. The evidence suggests that
these high-profile appearances of Oswald prior to the assassination were not
actually Oswald at all, but were CIA look-alike operatives putting on a show
in preparation for the main event. Of course this made him appear guilty and
the case virtually closed against him in the public mind before he had even
been arrested.
Shortly thereafter, he was conveniently assassinated by CIA/Mafia stooge
Jack Ruby.
In the case of the so-called WTC bombers, one individual, identified as a
hijacker, was a man named Mohamed Atta. This man was described as 'a citizen
of the world, travelling on a passport from the United Arab Emirates…living
in Germany'. Although already suspected by German authorities of taking part
in terrorist activities, his passport and visa were not suspended and he was
able to travel freely between Germany and the USA.
Though he was a student in Hamburg, he had plenty of money. He was able to
write a cheque for $10,000 for flying lessons in Florida. That must have
made an impression! In December 2000 he paid $1500 for a 6-hour Boeing 727
flight simulation at SimCentre Inc. in Florida. The instructor, Henry
George, recalled: 'Looking back at it, it was a little strange that all they
wanted to do was turns…most people who come here want to do takeoffs and
landings.'
A tad cheesy, one might think? But it works as a piece of convincing
circumstantial evidence as far as the gullible public are concerned.
As Conan Doyle was so ingenious in demonstrating in his novels about the
great detective Sherlock Holmes - 'facts' often point in the opposite
direction to the truth, and often the lazy and naïve detective will plump
for the most obvious conclusion and think no further - nor even laterally -
at where the evidence actually, ultimately leads.
The following comes from MSNBC's internet homepage report on September 24,
entitled 'Bush: "We're at War"':
At the time, Atta aroused no suspicion. When he turned in his rent-a-car in
Pompano Beach, Fla., on Sept. 9, before heading north on his suicide
mission, he reminded the dealer, Brad Warrick, that the car needed to be
serviced. "The only thing out of the ordinary," Warrick recalled, "was that
he was nice enough to let me know the car needed an oil change." Atta and
several friends were regulars at a Venice bar called the 44th Aero Squadron,
decorated in the motif of a bomber-squadron bunker, complete with sandbags.
"I never had any problems with them," said the owner, Ken Schortzmann. They
didn't want to be bothered, but didn't drink heavily and flirt with the
waitresses, like some of the other flight students. Atta seemed to be the
leader. "He had a fanny pack with a big roll of cash in it," said Schortzmann.
Last week Atta and two of his buddies seem to have gone out for a farewell
bender at a seafood bar called Shuckums. Atta drank five
Stoli-and-fruit-juices, while one of the others drank rum and Coke. For
once, Atta and his friends became agitated, shouting curse words in Arabic,
reportedly including a particularly blasphemous one that roughly translates
as "F-k God." There was a squabble when the waitress tried to collect the
$48 bill (her shift was ending and she wanted her tip). One of the Arabs
became indignant. "I work for American Airlines. I'm a pilot," he said.
"What makes you think I'd have a problem paying the bill?"
'Ah,' cries bumbling police detective Lestrade, 'the case could not be
clearer. All the evidence points to these chaps. They were seen with plenty
money; known terrorist links; plane flight simulation lessons. An open and
shut case if ever I did see one Mr 'Olmes.'
It is at this point that Holmes points out the inconsistencies that Islamic
extremists, prepared to die for their religious/political beliefs must
surely be the last people to visit a bar and drink five vodkas, considering
their ban on alcohol! Then to make such a ruckus and blaspheme against the
God they were prepared to die for, just before they were about to dispatch
themselves into his arms? To believe that would be incompatible with sanity!
What kind of super-terrorist network, with the power to evade global
Intelligence detection, employs a bunch of drunken rabble-rousers who would
prove to be so incompetent as to draw so much public attention to themselves
prior to pulling off one of the most secret and significant strikes in the
history of world terrorism?
I, for one think this all sounds far too implausible and convenient.
Cattle-fodder for the masses. Gravy for the brain.
The same report went on to say:
Although investigators now suspect that Atta may been the leader of his
cell, it is not clear if and when he was, in effect, "triggered." The
pattern of bin Laden's terrorism is to insert operatives into a country
where they are "sleepers," burrowed deep into the local culture, leading
normal lives while awaiting orders.
Here we appear to have some actual truth mixed with subtle spin. Atta could
very well have been, and probably was, a 'sleeper' agent. More than likely
he was 'triggered', not as a willing participant in a holy war for Allah,
but as a CIA mind-controlled assassin, programmed to play his part in
drawing attention to himself, before plunging his plane into the WTC.
Those people around the so-called 'civilised' world, especially in the US,
who are caught up in this charade, playing their part in preparing for war,
need to ask themselves just why it is that such a thing could happen? Why
does someone sacrifice their life and those of thousands? What has the USA
ever done to anyone to attract this kind of action?
Well, the list is as long as your arm. The USA and its allies have been the
largest terrorist organisation in history. They have destroyed countless
millions of lives in their struggle for power. They have oppressed the
Islamic nations as they have oppressed and parasitised the rest of the
world. Would it really be such a surprise that some of those oppressed
people would actually wish to fight back? If that is indeed what actually
occurred?
Those with an open-mind need to think a bit further and consider the
probability that this has all been an inside job from the start. The
Intelligence community is not so incompetent as to have allowed this to
happen through ignorance. They certainly had masses of data immediately
following the event! Enough to make numerous arrests and identify the major
players. Aided, of course by the sloppy trail conveniently left for the FBI
to sniff out, such as leaving Korans in public places, having air-flight
manuals left in cars, and hiring vehicles in their own names etc. Surely,
signs would have been apparent beforehand if such an incompetent crew had
been responsible?
Osama bin Laden is the obligatory 'bad guy' in the same vein as Oswald,
Sirhan, McVeigh etc. A CIA-trained agent - a Saudi Arabian heir to a fortune
- used to help organise and fund the covert war against the Soviets in
Afghanistan in the late 1970s onwards. Did he really ever cease to be a CIA
operative? Whether or not he was involved in the terrorist attack on America
remains to be seen. Perhaps we will never know for sure.
Food for thought
An event of such magnitude, with such fundamental implications for global
freedom, if deliberately orchestrated by the elite, would not have been
planned in the weeks prior to the event. It would have been on the agenda
for a very long time indeed. Who knows how long?
Was it known as long ago as August 1997 when it almost appeared as though
the mother of the future heirs to the British throne was about to announce
her engagement to Dodi Al Fayed? Should this have occurred, Diana and her
children would have been related to an Arab Muslim with known links to
terrorism! Al Fayed was a cousin of Adnan Khashoggi, of the Saudi Royal
family, a known CIA asset involved in arms sales to Iran. It is even
possible that Diana may have been willing to convert to Islam.
Is it possible that recent events in America are intrinsically connected to
what happened in Paris in 1997? Was the Establishment eradicating a future
embarrassment, as part of the equation which seems to have so many complex
inter-linking factors pointing a huge finger of suspicion at our usual
suspects?
Another factor which never gets a mention in mainstream media is the strange
fact that, despite the Royal family being the head of the Protestant
Anglican Church (Protestantism being essentially a more Judaised, more Old
Testament focussed, form of Catholicism), every male child is circumcised by
a rabbi!
It is noteworthy to mention in this connection, that, following tradition of
the Royal House of England, which requires circumsicion of all male
children, it was the Jewish Mohel of London rather than the Royal Physician
who was called to circumcise the son of Princess Elizabeth. The following
news item from a British newspaper will be of interest:
Crown Prince Charles Circumcised by a London Mohel
London (JTA)-Crown Prince Charles, son of Princess Elizabeth and heir to the
British throne, was circumcised in Buckingham Palace by Rabbi Jacob Snowman,
official Mohel of the London Jewish community.
(Rabbi Malka's Brit Milah website)
One contact of mine wrote to Rabbi Malka - a highly respected Mohel of the
Jewish community - and asked why the Royals are being circumcised by a
rabbi, considering the fact that the circumcision is considered to be a
sacred covenant between Jews and Yahweh. His reply was basically as above.
However, another contact of mine, who had engaged a local rabbi on this very
same question was told that he did not understand Malka's logic and agreed
that a rabbi should only perform such a ritual on Jews, given the clear
religious significance of the ritual.
Without wishing to appear to be going too far over the top with speculation
in all this, surely it is a reasonable question to ask why the children of
the head of the Church of England are being initiated by a rabbi into one of
the most sacred Jewish rituals? Do the heads of the Church of England
actually follow a religion other than that which they appear to. Are the
British Royal family secretly practising Judaism, as opposed to Christianity?
If so, this would add extra weight to the argument that Judaism and Zionism,
and the interconnected network of secret societies and elite families which
incorporate this faction of the New World Order establishment, is likely to
be behind, rather than the 'victims' of such events as we saw in America on
September the 11th, and in Paris in August 1997.
Islam is the greatest enemy and biggest threat to Zionism in the modern age.
For the Zionist aims, as recorded in the Bible, Talmud and Zohar, to be
fulfilled, then Islam must be rendered impotent, enslaved or destroyed.
Jerusalem must be returned entirely to Jewish hands.
Here, perhaps it is important to reiterate that Islamic terrorism is all
about their opposition to Zionism and what they see as the West's allegiance
with it. The Protocols are well known amongst the Islamic world and taken
extremely seriously by many Muslims. Although, if you were to ask your
average American citizen if they know what lies behind acts of Islamic
terrorism, I doubt if he or she would be able to tell you. It seems,
however, that your average citizen, who relies heavily on the tv news for
information on such affairs, is not going to get to know about this from
that particular medium. One would think that in the aftermath of the attack,
and during the round-the-clock coverage of the event and related issues,
that someone would think to air a few shows on the reason behind the thing,
and perhaps even the odd historical documentary to keep the citizens
informed of just why they have suffered so enormously.
Rather than this, the world has been subjected to a barrage of war-mongering
propaganda, emotional manipulation, avoidance of essential issues, and
outright lies by the mainstream media. Surely the 'land of the free' stands
for freedom of information and freedom of thought? Surely to be truly free,
society requires an informed population? Surely the people deserve
informative and accurate reports of the central issues?
The cynical words of the late great American comedian and social commentator
Bill Hicks are so relevant today. In his message to Americans that they are
unable to see past the government propaganda, he informed them: 'You are
free…to do as we tell you!'
Known in advance - the proof
What further evidence do we have as proof that this terrorist attack was no
sudden unforeseen event? At least as early as 4 days prior to the attack a
number of investments in the City of London were mysteriously dropped, as
though certain investors were privy to the knowledge that an event was
imminent that would cause massive losses on the Stock Market (although
recent reports have suggested - perhaps too conveniently - that the actions
were instigated by the terrorists themselves as bin Laden is known to invest
in the Stock Markets):
Richard Crossley, an analyst at Teather & Greenwood, a City broker, said
that he had tracked suspicious short selling and share dumping in a swath of
stocks badly affected by the terrorist attacks.
He said that on the Friday before the attacks, more than 10 million shares
in Merrill Lynch, the US investment bank, were sold compared with 4 million
on a normal day. He added that exceptionally high volumes of retail and
leisure stocks had also caught his attention.
"Before the attacks there was no pattern to this phenomenon," he said. "The
shares that were sold were doing very well and someone was selling them in
very large quantities with no real reason." Mr Crossley believes that
someone with inside knowledge of the attacks could have been making money on
its expected outcome for up to three weeks before the terrorists struck.
"What is more awful than he should aim a stiletto blow at the heart of
Western financial markets? But to profit from it. Words fail me," Mr
Crossley said.
(The Times London September 18)
And the Intelligence agencies of the world had no prior knowledge of this
attack? Give me a break!
Consider also the fact that the US, long before the terrorist attacks, had
already planned and begun to implement an attack against Afghanistan and the
removal of Osma bin Laden! What a coincidence too, that this was all planned
in advance to take place at exactly the time the so-called 'response' to the
terrorist attack is going ahead! The following piece of news was not
reported by the mainstream tv media and probably is one of those few reports
which seems to get into the press and subsequently ignored, despite being of
major significance.
A former Pakistani diplomat has told the BBC that the US was planning
military action against Osama Bin Laden and the Taleban even before last
week's attacks.
Niaz Naik, a former Pakistani Foreign Secretary, was told by senior American
officials in mid-July that military action against Afghanistan would go
ahead by the middle of October.
Mr Naik said US officials told him of the plan at a UN-sponsored
international contact group on Afghanistan which took place in Berlin.
Mr Naik told the BBC that at the meeting the US representatives told him
that unless Bin Laden was handed over swiftly America would take military
action to kill or capture both Bin Laden and the Taleban leader, Mullah Omar.
The wider objective, according to Mr Naik, would be to topple the Taleban
regime and install a transitional government of moderate Afghans in its
place - possibly under the leadership of the former Afghan King Zahir Shah.
Mr Naik was told that Washington would launch its operation from bases in
Tajikistan, where American advisers were already in place.
He was told that Uzbekistan would also participate in the operation and that
17,000 Russian troops were on standby.
Mr Naik was told that if the military action went ahead it would take place
before the snows started falling in Afghanistan, by the middle of October at
the latest.
He said that he was in no doubt that after the World Trade Center bombings
this pre-existing US plan had been built upon and would be implemented
within two or three weeks.
And he said it was doubtful that Washington would drop its plan even if Bin
Laden were to be surrendered immediately by the Taleban.
(George Arney, BBC News, 18 September, 2001)
Naik also informs us that the Taliban and bin Laden were warned of the
planned strikes two months before the terrorist strike against New York and
Washington.
The warning to the Taliban originated at a four-day meeting of senior
Americans, Russians, Iranians and Pakistanis at a hotel in Berlin in
mid-July. The conference, the third in a series dubbed "brainstorming on
Afghanistan", was part of a classic diplomatic device known as "track two"…
…"I told the Pakistani government, who informed the Taliban via our foreign
office and the Taliban ambassador here."
The three Americans at the Berlin meeting were Tom Simons, a former US
ambassador to Pakistan, Karl "Rick" Inderfurth, a former assistant secretary
of state for south Asian affairs, and Lee Coldren, who headed the office of
Pakistan, Afghan and Bangladesh affairs in the state department until 1997.
According to Mr Naik, the Americans raised the issue of an attack on
Afghanistan at one of the full sessions of the conference, convened by
Francesc Vendrell, a Spanish diplomat who serves as the UN secretary
general's special representative on Afghanistan. In the break afterwards, Mr
Naik told the Guardian yesterday, he asked Mr Simons why the attack should
be more successful than Bill Clinton's missile strikes on Afghanistan in
1998, which caused 20 deaths but missed Bin Laden.
"He said this time they were very sure. They had all the intelligence and
would not miss him this time. It would be aerial action, maybe helicopter
gunships, and not only overt, but from very close proximity to Afghanistan.
The Russians were listening to the conversation but not participating." (my
emphasis)
(extracted from article: Threat of US strikes passed to Taliban weeks before
NY attack - by Jonathan Steele, Ewen MacAskill, Richard Norton-Taylor and Ed
Harriman. The Guardian, September 22, 2001)
Even if, at the very outside chance, the terrorist bombing against America
was actually a pre-emptive response to planned military action by the US
against Afghanistan and bin Laden, rather than a deliberate inside job by
the US-led New World Order, either way one looks at this situation the US
government caused this tragedy!!!
All that baloney about there being an Intelligence break down has to be
utter tripe!
The American dream
While the American people are shocked grieving, running telethons, gathering
in the streets to proclaim their support for their 'great' leadership and
the plan to rid the world of 'evil', the fact that their own government is
responsible for their tragic suffering is ignored.
The pain and unbridled truth is that the general populous of America are
gullible and naïve. They are brainwashed into their illusory mindset that
America is the 'land of the free', whilst America is in fact the very evil
empire they believe they are opposing. Those same masses of programmed
Americans are not only the victims of this terrible event, but are also the
cause of it. It is they who give their support to the tyrants who control
their country and the world through terrorism and deceit. Without their
support in thought and deed, this whole charade could never work.
For all of our sakes America WAKE UP!
You are the global terrorists!
You are not the 'land of the free'. Your government is not the protector of
freedom and governor of 'right' in the world. You do not stand for 'liberty
and justice for all'. You stand for exploitation and slavery, greed and
injustice.
And what you sow, so shall you reap!
The people who have suffered and died in New York and Washington were not
all totally innocent victims of an unprovoked terrorist assault. Yes, the
rescue services showed great courage, putting their own live before those of
others - many of whom died bravely in the course of their duty and deserve
the enormous praise and respect they have been given in the aftermath of the
disaster. However, the WTC is a major cog in the machine of global
exploitation and terrorism. Where on Earth do you think all of that money
and property which is processed every day through the WTC comes from? It
comes from the exploitation of the planet, the people, the animals, the
environment. In order for America to be 'free' and prosperous, millions upon
millions of people and animals have suffered and died horrendously, and
continue to do so in numbers far greater, every day, than were killed in the
strikes on New York and Washington! Are they not also worthy of our tears
and respect, our love and aid? Do they not also have the right not to be
terrorised, raped, starved and killed - by us?
You Americans who believe in the utter crap which you are fed from birth in
the way of propaganda - and thankfully there are many Americans who do not
buy it and are not part of the sad and sordid affair I am outlining here -
have played your part in creating this whole sorry mess.
Until now, you have been relatively untouched. You have lived a life of
relative comfort and prosperity - like most of us in the West - and have
been insulated and disassociated yourselves from the harsh reality of what
actually occurs in the real world. Now you have tasted first hand the bitter
reality, the pain and heartache of terrorism, war and suffering on your own
doorstep, consider those areas around the world in which suffering and
exploitation, hunger, war and fear is the daily norm. And realise that in
the great majority of cases it is because America and its allies in the
Western military industrial complex have either caused it or allowed it to
happen in order that a) the so-called 'free' world can prosper, buy bigger
and better things, live a more luxurious life etc, and b) the few
ultra-powerful self-appointed elite can maintain their secret tyranny.
It is your own government you should be directing your anger at now,
America. You need to address the cause and not the symptoms of this
sickness. As do we all in the 'First World' nations outside America, to whom
much of the above applies equally. As far as the elite are concerned,
'ignorance is bliss'. So they cultivate us like plants, keeping us in the
dark and feeding us bullshit. They keep us servile by giving us what they
have cultivated us to believe we want and need. Because while there are full
bellies, there are empty minds.
For Tomorrows
It seems that the true 'evil' Empire is about to get even stronger.
It is time to take a bigger view; to look at our own selves and attitudes;
to examine our own reactions to all this and try to put fear in its place.
Because fear feeds the flames. The flame of the spirit burns brightest
without fear. Love is the flame of the spirit.
Through fear, people will enlist their minds and bodies in the war against
humanity and our freedom, while believing they are fighting for it.
The best way to see this whole charade is in reverse. It makes more sense
that way when one understands that the elite and the consciousness which
controls them works in reverse.
When they say 'hate', we should think 'love'.
When they say 'move fast', we should apply the brakes.
When they say 'them', we should think 'us'.
When they extol 'freedom', we should consider just exactly what they mean by
that, and see that what they actually mean is enslavement.
It is so easy to get caught up in the movie and play the role dictated to us
by those who are experts in manipulating our emotions and thoughts.
We are so much better than that. We are able to reason and check our base
emotions with logic and spiritual insight.
Imagine if nobody decided to play the parts allotted to them? With no
audience participation, what would happen to the show?
Recently, we have seen how people, given enough reason, can come together in
a common cause. The bravery and dedication of the New Yorkers, who have
tirelessly dedicated themselves to aiding in the rescue attempts should be
an inspiration to us all. The resilience of all those affected and the
ability, in times of crisis, to open arms and hearts for the common good,
shows us that we are not incapable of drawing on our strengths and humanity
to try to make the world a better place. As well as grief, hate and fear, I
have seen great love and kindness displayed by the American people. Rising
from the ashes of the sadness, however, has also been the coming together of
a nation of individuals who recognise the need for freedom, justice, unity
and a spiritual light in all of our lives.
'Why do we need a war to feel good about ourselves?' asked Bill Hicks.
Perhaps a greater indictment on the state of humanity is to be found in the
answer to the question: why, after so many centuries of seeing the results
of hatred and fear, war and destruction, do we still need people like Bill
Hicks to ask such questions?
Those who ignore the lessons of history are doomed to repeat them.
Those who allow others to think for them will forever be puppets of anyone
ruthless enough to manipulate them.
What does it take to wake up the love which is inside everyone of us and to
finally put aside the fear and hatred and ignorance?
My fiends, we are at war. But the war is not a new one. The 'enemy' is not
terrorism. It does not lie 'outside'. It is not 'alien' - whether ET or
human. The war is being fought on a spiritual level. It is the eternal war
between the light and dark aspects of our very souls. The enemy is within.
We mustn't let propaganda confuse the issue and divert our attention towards
red herrings and inappropriate reactions. We mustn't let religion or
politics dictate our lives and cause us to ignore the battle we face every
day to overcome the base elements of our consciousness which too often
dictates our responses to life's challenges.
We are our own Devil. We are our own God.
We create our own reality by our thoughts. We allow our own inner predators
- our own inner demons - to blind us to the Truth and to therefore create
the reality which the predators desire.
The predators hide in the primordial brain, the part of the mind which we
developed in our evolution through the reptile stage. It is reactive and
unemotional, like the reptiles we evolved from. It serves to keep us alive
by controlling the primal need for sex, food, territoriality, fight or
flight. It is cold-blooded and without reason.
We have the power to keep this aspect of ourselves in check with our higher
senses of awareness, reason, intellect and spirituality.
Those world leaders who have been dominated by this reptilian aspect of
themselves have manipulated mankind into being their willing prey by
magnifying their cunning and intellect whilst destroying their own
spirituality. They are now trying to manipulate the rest of the world into
reacting against implanted ideas - stimuli designed to re-programme the
mind. They have reversed reality. They have convinced us that it is in our
best interest to become their slaves, by convincing us we are free. They
have conditioned our responses and enchanted us with their fake religions
and politics. They have used every weapon available for their own ends and
have assaulted our minds on every level.
And still the world is captured, spellbound. While we await Jesus, God,
Allah, Yahweh, the ETs, the 'glorious revolution' etc. to come from 'above'
and save us, we sit like rabbits in headlights, and as the car ploughs
forward the real impending danger remains unseen and ignored.
There is nothing 'out there' which is coming to save you. There is nothing
'out there' which you don't already have inside you.
Everything you have seen and will see and imagine you may see one day 'out
there' is a huge guiding finger pointing right back at you. Stop watching
the finger.
We have an infinite number of tomorrows to get this right. How many of them
are we going to waste repeating all our yesterdays?
|