The View From Marrs
June 3, 2002
CHEMTRAILS: Covert Immunization Program or Surplus Population Reduction?
For more than 3 years now, I have heard widespread reports of aircraft
leaving cross-hatching chemical trails in the sky. Being a former
award-winning aviation writer, I initially wrote these stories off as
reports from persons unaccustomed to the common vapor trails left in the
wake of high-flying aircraft.
But now I'm not so sure.
The other morning from my front porch I watched as several jet aircraft, at
least two running parallel, created tic-tac-toe patterns in an otherwise
cloudless North Texas sky. I would estimate these craft at somewhere around
20,000 feet. The trails spread outward, blended, and within two hours had
created a hazy cloud cover with only occasional patches of blue sky. By
afternoon I was wheezing and experiencing a shortness of breath.
Most interesting was yet another jet at a much higher altitude, no less than
30,000 feet, which also led a sharply-defined condensation or vapor trail.
In this case, however, the trail dissipated and totally disappeared as
expected from evaporation in low humidity of North Texas. This was a true
vapor trail. But what about the lower ones?
This experience brought home to me the claims of many people across the
country who have reported large military-type aircraft leaving crossing
trails which blend together into a cirrus cloud cover and settle to earth.
Such reports have been coming in from all over the continental 48 states for
more than three years now and some of the stories I had heard came to mind.
One came from a producer friend, who early in 1999 stood on a Hollywood set
and watched a large tanker plane make several trips up and down the
California coast leaving a trail which coalesced into a hazy cloud which
drifted over Los Angeles. This was clearly not a normal point A to point B
flight.
Another story came from a retired police and military pilot in Oklahoma who
witnessed KC-135 and KC-10 military craft crisscrossing the sky near his
home in mid-January. Later he became ill and learned from his doctor that
the local hospitals were overflowing with patients suffering from flu-like
symptoms. Checking with his former National Guard unit, this man was told
that no one knew anything about the craft and their trails but that they had
been ordered not to fly in the area of the craft on the days in question.
Even more worrisome was the report from the owner or a large Funeral Home
near Dallas-Fort Worth who said deaths this February were twice as high as
the same time last year with no sign of waning. Most of these were elderly
person suffering from respiratory ailments. Doctors report an increasing
number of respiratory ailments and one pharmacist I know told he had not
seen such widespread respiratory problems in his more than 30 years of
experience.
Washington reporter Mike Blair wrote in January that what has been dubbed
"chemtrails" is actually "anti-bacteriological warfare chemicals being
tested by the federal government." Some of Blair's sources told him that the
covert spraying is being conducted by the super secret Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency (DARPA), a charge the agency's director has denied.
Considering the objections raised by members of the U. S. military who last
year were ordered to undergo Anthrax inoculations coupled with the prospect
of public panic, it has been theorized that the government is attempting to
covertly immunize the general population. It has been reported that this
program gained it legality from US Code Title 50, Section 1520, which gives
the Secretary of Defense authority to order testing "involving the use of a
chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population" for research
purposes.
But this theory fails when the chemical composition of the chemtrails is
considered. Last April, samples from these chemtrails were analyzed by a
facility in Victoria, British Columbia, which is licensed by the U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and found to contain in addition to
JP-8 jet fuel (possibly the carrier medium which contains the additive
ethylene dibromide, banned as a pesticide due to causing severe respiratory
reactions even at low levels) numerous pathogens, disease causing agents.
These included Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, which not only causes respiratory
infection but also attacks the immunization system; Serratia Marcescens, an
antibiotic-resistant bacteria which causes pneumonia, endocarditis and
meningitis; as well as Streptomyces and molds capable of inducing heart
disease, upper respiratory and gastrointestinal ailments.
Could this covert program be behind the Nile Flu and other respiratory
outbreaks which reportedly are resisting normal treatment? And what is it's
true purpose? It seems clear that if this toxic stew of pathogens is
intended as an immunization, the cure might be worst than the cause.
And when in history has an entire population been unknowingly poisoned by
its own leaders while footing the bill for such an outrage?
And don't look to the corporate-owned mass media or this year's crop of
presidential hopefuls to give us any answer to these questions. They're too
busy verbally attacking each other, bashing the Second Amendment and arguing
over the Confederate battle flag in South Carolina, you know, all those big
issues.
PS. Speaking of the Second Amendment (the one that gives Americans the right
to own firearms, remember?), here are some intriguing statistics:
The approximately 700,000 physicians in the United States cause about
120,000 accidental deaths each year resulting in 0.171 accidental deaths per
physician. The 80 million U. S. gun owners cause 1,500 accidental deaths
each year representing 0.0000188 accidental deaths per gun owner.
These numbers must mean either that a doctor is approximately 9,000 times
more dangerous than a gun owner or statistics can be skewed just about any
way one desires.
http://www.jimmarrs.com/view/view060302.html
|