About Mind Control
NIH Physician's Statement
In the mid to late eighties, while I was a practicing physician, I was
working almost exclusively in the field of
psycho-neuro-immuno-endocrinology, especially as concerned the new malady,
called Chronic Fatigue Immune Dysfunction Syndrome. I had become good
friends, Health and Wellness Advisor, and personal physician to US Senator
Claiborne Pell of Rhode Island. I had also become very close friends with
his Special Legislative Assistant.
It was in the 1987-88 timeframe that I was introduced to an individual of
authority in the US Government who talked about a strange new phenomenon.
This individual wanted me to meet a special investigative reporter who had
been devoting all his time to investigating this new phenomenon. He thought
that with my background in the neural sciences and some of the esoteric
things I had been aware of in the realm of the physics of consciousness that
I might be of assistance both to victims of this phenomenon and to the
investigators of it.
He told me that there was significant evidence that the phenomenon was real
and viewed by those involved in trying to understand it as very dangerous.
He warned me from the outset that many of the scientists who had been close
to understanding the technology behind the phenomenon wound up dying from
apparent heart attacks. He said that in the opinion of many who had
seriously investigated this phenomenon, that it appeared to be as dangerous
a threat to humanity as anything ever in history, because it was not yet
traceable to a specific source, and that it was so malevolent, that it had
the potential to lead humanity to its own destruction.
I was also told that it was not uncommon for those investigating the
phenomenon to become victims of it themselves, and that he considered that I
should know the risks before volunteering to help. Because of my
relationship to the Senator and my commitment to assist in matters affecting
the health and welfare of the nation, I felt it was my duty to participate
to the best of my ability.
I agreed to meet with the investigative reporter. He came to my office and
gave me the first briefing on the phenomenon. I wish to preface my account
with the fact that through the succeeding three or four years, I became
convinced of the reality of the phenomenon, and in fact did come under
attack, although in a manner not typical. What he described was as follows.
The majority of those who were victims of this "technology" would report
that they had somehow received an implant of a speaker inside their head.
Almost incessantly they would hear noise, as in background noise in a busy
room with activity of people and machinery. They would also hear voices
addressing them specifically. Often they would be harangued incessantly with
exhortations to commit vile acts, such as inappropriate sexual behaviors
from homosexual assaults to heterosexual rape and pedophilic acts.
They would also experience the emotional accompaniment of these exhortations
as urges that were hard to control. Often the urges and thoughts and voices
caused the victim to experience tremendous fear and rage. Some of the
victims experienced the "loss of time," in which they would be conscious,
but somehow missed what happened to them for extended periods, ranging from
minutes to hours at a time. They could not account for themselves during
these periods.
Some of the victims made the association that these "attacks" coincided with
watching television or from working at their computers. A number of victims
learned that if they lost themselves in a crowd, they could frequently
interrupt the "transmissions." This would lead them often to wander into
crowded places in order to get some peace.
Inevitably these people would seek medical attention. The majority of these
people had no prior history of psychiatric illness. Their experience of the
voices had a sudden onset, and they could pinpoint the time or date the
first awareness of these events occurred. Although many would be told that
they had a psychiatric illness causing them auditory hallucinations, a
number of eminent psychiatrists who studied some of these victims felt that
the ones truly victimized by this "technology" did not fall into any
psychiatric diagnosis, and that they were not experiencing auditory
hallucinations. Quite a number of victims were successful well-adjusted
people prior to the onset of the symptoms. Characteristically, all of the
content of the voices, which was so perverse, had no reference to past
character development in these people.
This reporter, who we will call M, told me that quite by chance, when one
physician had prescribed a phenothiazine called Haldol without telling the
patient what it was, the voices stopped almost immediately. However, when
the patient found out the name of the medicine, the voices resumed. They
tried this on a number of other patients, and found the same thing happened.
It was as if there was something physiologically relevant to the action of
the "transmission" that interfered with it, but if the monitoring agent
behind the technology found out what the interfering drug was, it somehow
could abort the efficacy.
One has to say, as a skeptic, that an initial placebo effect was eliminated
once the patient discovered that the medicine was used for psychiatric
patients with hallucinations or psychosis. Yet, one has to wonder why, when
Haldol is very effective in eliminating hallucinosis with or without the
patient's knowledge, why there seemed to be this reproducible escape of
efficacy, once the name of the medicine was introduced to consciousness of
the victim.
Another attribute of the attackers according to M was their ability to learn
of the victim's past medical history. One of the manifestations of the
attack often was the reproduction of acute symptomatology that clinically
resembled perfectly attacks of genuine disease conditions, such as acute
abdominal pain associated with appendicitis, or chest pain associated with
myocardial ischemia, of abdominal pain associated with pelvic inflammatory
disease. When these people would seek medical attention for these symptoms,
however, there would be absolutely no evidence clinically that anything
truly pathologic was happening. Again, this would contribute to the judgment
of the health provider that the victim was a "crock," meaning that it was
all some form of psychosomatic neurosis.
M declared that his investigation of this phenomenon had taken him around
the world. He had interviewed individuals in Soviet agencies, Israeli
intelligence, our own CIA, NSA, and Naval Intelligence organizations. He
found that many agencies in other countries had become aware of this and
other similar phenomena, and although they acknowledged working on
technology that could influence thought and feeling of human beings, made
the distinction between their efforts and this phenomenon.
M stated that he was not able to get those assurances from the people he
interviewed at NSA. I remember a specific instance in which M had gained
possession of a copy of a transmission recorded from a victim's television
set that was submitted to NSA for analysis. Prior to its submission, other
scientists had verified that a very unusual signal had been received by some
very special device they employed to monitor this victim's TV set. I was not
told the nature of the signal nor was I told anything about the recording
device. What he told me however, was that upon submitting it to the NSA,
they were never able to get the recording back, nor were they able to
ascertain from the NSA official what their findings revealed about the
transmission. M was making the association that the victimization process
itself could be propagated from person to person.
He stated that he felt that even through telephone lines, one victim talking
to another person could result in the person to whom the victim was talking
become a victim themselves. He also reported that regarding his
investigation, it seemed that as he got closer to answers, that the people
he would speak to would irrationally shut him off, even after being
initially engaged, interested and even participating in the investigation.
He believed that the controlling entity or entities could sense when to
interfere and actually cause people to block their own perceptions and
awareness. M actually came to believe that the scope of interference could
actually lead people to do things that were destructive to themselves, like
cause their own automobile accidents.
He believed that Senator Pell had himself become an unaware victim of the
manipulation of this force. He made this conclusion because of times at
which Pell would be seriously engaged with M, it was as if a switch had been
pulled and suddenly Pell would disengage, seeming to forget what the
conversation was about or that he had any interest in what M was presenting
at all. Yet later Pell would again invite M back for further discussion,
only to have the discussion interrupted again in the same way. M was
convinced it was not simply a distraction caused by being too busy or
preoccupied with other things. M also took note of the fact that some of the
others he had met along the way with insight into this phenomenon had simply
suddenly forgotten its importance. And when reminded by M, they would deny
even ever knowing about it. M felt this was a defensive maneuver by the
agent or agents behind the "technology."
My wife and I began to notice peculiar things in our own life immediately
after M would place a phone call to me. For reasons unknown to us we would
start to argue with each other and have very bad feelings toward one
another. It became such a pattern that my wife pointed it out to me. I had
never told her anything about M or the content of our discussions.
There was an episode that occurred in 1991 on December 17. Things seemed to
be very intense with M. One night after a particularly intense discussion
with M on the phone, my wife began to experience symptoms of lower abdominal
pain. She became extremely weak and felt horribly sick. She recalled that
the symptoms were exactly what she had experienced after sustaining an
iatrogenically caused episode of pelvic inflammatory disease, after a tubal
insufflation blew a smoldering streptococcal infection in her endometrium
into her peritoneal cavity. She had undergone an evaluation for infertility
after coming off the BC pill and not getting pregnant after a year of
trying. This acute P.I.D. almost killed her and we were told that the
residual scarring could mean she would never get pregnant. Not withstanding
the scarring we were fortunate to have three sons after a physician tried
her on the fertility pill, Clomid. However, the fact that she had scarring
in her peritoneal cavity from that infection was thoroughly documented.
That night the symptoms got worse and worse. I took her to the hospital for
evaluation by her OB GYN. He agreed that she had signs of peritoneal
inflammation on physical exam, but her blood work was normal. He said we
should go home and see what happened. If it didn't improve we were to return
in the morning and he would do a laparoscopic examination under anesthesia.
As I was leaving the hospital after dropping off her miniscule urine sample,
while my wife waited in the car, I had a very unusual experience. It was of
a personal nature, but suffice to say that after it, my wife felt better
after almost losing consciousness.
We decided that because it was already arranged for her to have the
laparoscopy the next morning that we should go ahead with it. We did. We
were amazed to hear the results. He doctor said she had the pelvis of a
14-year-old girl. There was no scarring, no evidence of current or prior
pelvic inflammatory disease. To this day we do not know what happened to
what had been thoroughly documented before. All we know is she never again
has had the kind of sharp pains she would get at intervals from the "tearing
of adhesions," which always was the explanation for those pains.
Shortly thereafter, I lost touch with M. About a year later I tried to reach
him to see how he was doing. I was shocked to find that he was no longer
working on this project, but was on to something else. When I said why would
you abandon the work you were so fanatically committed to for the sake of
humanity, his response was as if he had no idea to what I was referring.
Since then, neither my wife nor myself has had any further personal
experience with anything resembling what took place during those years of
frequent contact with M. I did see a number of patients who were afflicted
with the voices and urges. I never was able to help any one of them.
It has been suggested that this horrible technology is something covertly
being used by our government. Although I cannot rule it in or out, I
sincerely believe that something real is going on that is not a part of
normal physiology to affect these people. Not everyone who hears voices is a
victim of this, just as not everyone who is a victim of this hears voices.
My experience suggests to me that there is something definitely impacting
certain people, perhaps at random, from the outside in.
In conclusion, further scientific investigation like the experiment of Dr.
Byrd's for CAHRA to record the voices in victim's heads are needed in order
to try to understand the mechanisms that are producing them. I also feel
that being able to determine the type of signal itself would add valuable
clues to the mechanism of transmission. For example, certain psychoactive
properties have been attributed to ELF Electromagnetic signals and
microwaves that are modulated with ELF signals. The presence of such signal
means that there is a source that is directing them at victims.
It should become possible to test the victim's home and office environments
for sources transmitting the signals such as telephones, televisions, and
computers. Of course, the signals may be transmitted directly by other
technological means, also. If present, the source would be guilty of illegal
interference with the victims' civil rights and of experimenting on them
without their permission.
Brain imaging techniques are available, such as MRI and PET scans. The MRI
is useful for examining brain structure, whereas the PET scan is designed to
examine the metabolic activity in the brain. Unless a victim has been
subjected to signals that affect the physical structure of the brain, the
MRI is of limited value; however the PET scan could determine the difference
between internally generated symptoms and externally generated signals.
Another useful technique is the multi-channel EEG beam scan that will
indicate alterations in the electrical activity of the brain as a function
of stimulus.
[Each page of original "Statement about "mind control"" initialed EB by Dr.
Eldon Byrd.]
|