WSWS : News & Analysis : North America
US anthrax attackers aimed to assassinate
Democratic leaders Media silent on military links
By Jerry White
23 January 2002
In the more than three months since anthrax-infected letters were mailed to
US Senators Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy, evidence has emerged about the
source and motives of the attack which has vast political implications.
It is now generally accepted that the anthrax came from a domestic source,
not from the Middle East. Given the fact that the intended victims were
prominent leaders of the Democratic Party, it is clear that the perpetrators
must be linked to right-wing organizations in the US. In December, the
anthrax in the letters was traced to biological warfare facilities run by
the US military.
Most recently, the Washington Post reported January 21 that at least 27
biological warfare specimens, including anthrax bacteria, had gone
unaccounted for at the Army's Fort Detrick, Maryland lab, prompting an
internal investigation in 1992. Lab workers told the Post that they had
produced anthrax in powder form, contrary to official claims that the lab
generated only "wet" anthrax, which is less dangerous.
Citing interviews with lab personnel, the newspaper concluded: "the emerging
details are consistent with the increasingly popular hypothesis that last
fall's bioterrorist attacks were the work of a current or former Fort
Detrick scientist."
In other words, the leaders of the Democratic Party were targeted for
assassination by right-wing elements that have some connection to the
military. This staggering fact, however, has been met with a strange silence
by the media, government officials and the Democrats themselves, including
the two senators who were targeted.
Investigators have determined that the letters contained weapons- grade
anthrax, which an FBI microbiologist said was designed for "overkill." Two
postal workers at the mail facility where the tainted letters were processed
died after being exposed to up to 3,000 times the lethal dosage of the
bacteria, while scores of Senate office workers were only spared because
they were quickly treated.
The anthrax powder has been genetically traced to a single US military
source: the Army's Dugway Proving Grounds in Utah, the only facility known
to have processed anthrax into the highly lethal powder form found in the
letters. The spores in the letters to Daschle and Leahy were identical to
those sent from Dugway to the Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious
Disease (USAMRID) at Fort Detrick, in Frederick, Maryland, just outside of
Washington, DC, and to a CIA lab in Langley, Virginia.
Within political and media circles it is generally conceded that the
assassination plot was hatched by right-wing elements in the US. In a barely
reported comment last month Senator Daschle told a CNN interviewer, almost
in passing, that he believes the most likely suspect in the attacks was
someone related to the US military. But neither Daschle, Leahy, nor any
other Democratic Party spokesman has sought to make an issue of this
attempted political murder.
The news media all but dropped mention of anthrax once it became clear that
neither Osama bin Laden nor Saddam Hussein was responsible for the attacks
and the White House could no longer use such claims to bolster its war
effort and sweeping assault on civil liberties. As the military link to the
attacks came to light, the media sought to blunt the significance of the
exposure. Typical was Time magazine, which attempted to reassure its
readers: "While the possibility of an Army connection has raised a few
eyebrows, investigators are urging people not to jump to any conclusions."
Targets of the extreme right
Daschle and Leahy have long been targets of vitriol by the extreme right of
the Republican Party, which considers them hardcore opponents of Bush's
agenda. As Senate Majority Leader, Daschle is the most prominent Democratic
officeholder and a possible challenger to Bush in the 2004 presidential
elections. He has been the subject of a non-stop smear campaign by the Wall
Street Journal, which accused Daschle in an editorial last November of
"conducting his own guerilla war against Mr. Bush, blocking the President's
[domestic] agenda at every turn." The statement was only one of many
designed to incite reactionary elements with whom the Journal is politically
and ideologically allied and which are tied to the Republicans and the
military.
As chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Vermont Senator Leahy has been a
target of anti-abortion fanatics and the most hawkish military types for
delaying Bush's judicial appointments and raising mild criticisms over
military tribunals and other violations of civil liberties.
During the Clinton administration the Republican Party repeatedly sought to
incite the most reactionary elements in the military with claims the
Democratic president was undermining military preparedness, selling nuclear
secrets to China and engaged in other disloyal acts. In a thinly veiled
effort to stir up violence against Clinton, North Carolina Senator Jesse
Helms told a television interviewer that it would be dangerous for Clinton
to visit the military bases in his state. Because of the president's views
on gays in the military and his opposition to the Vietnam War, the senator
said, "Mr. Clinton better watch out if he comes down here. He'd better have
a bodyguard."
During the Monica Lewinsky affair some members of the officer corps openly
defied laws prohibiting them from publicly expressing contempt for civilian
political authorities. Several active-duty officers wrote letters published
in the Navy Times and Army Times, which denounced Clinton as a "criminal,"
while others circulated petitions supporting the impeachment and removal of
their nominal commander-in- chief.
The Republicans' theft of the 2000 presidential election relied to a great
extent on their connections to the military brass. With the Bush camp
fearing a recount of votes would eliminate their narrow lead in Florida, the
Republicans mobilized military officials to supply large numbers of absentee
ballots from armed forces personnel stationed overseas. Many of the ballots
lacked postmarks or bore postmarks later than Election Day, suggesting that
there was a concerted effort to solicit late votes and ship them without
postmarks so as to conceal the fact they were illegal.
The Bush campaign then launched a witch-hunting attack on Democratic
candidate Al Gore, portraying the efforts of the Democrats to weed out
invalid military ballots as an anti-American attack on the armed forces.
Montana Governor Marc Racicot, a leading spokesman for the Bush campaign,
told a press conference: "The vice president's lawyers have gone to war, in
my judgment, against the men and women who serve in the armed forces."
Retired General Norman Schwarzkopf, the commander of US forces in the
Persian Gulf War, denounced Gore for denying servicemen their right to vote.
In the wake of the September 11 attacks, Republican officials such as
Attorney General John Ashcroft portrayed the slightest questioning of Bush's
attacks on democratic rights as aiding and abetting the terrorists. Even
after the anthrax attacks Daschle and Leahy continued to be targeted by
right-wing talk show hosts and newspaper columnists who denounced them for
undermining national security. The national conservative weekly Human Events
ran an article about Leahy with the prominent headline "Osama's Enabler in
Congress," sparking scores of hate messages to his office.
Daschle came under particular attack for opposing the billions more in tax
breaks included in Bush's so-called economic stimulus package.
Ads were circulated in Daschle's home state of South Dakota featuring
side-by-side photographs of him and Saddam Hussein. Bush administration
officials refused to distance themselves from the right-wing campaign, with
Vice President Dick Cheney denouncing Daschle as an "obstructionist" on
NBC's "Meet the Press" in mid- December, claiming the Democratic senator was
blocking an economic recovery.
Bush's double standard
The Bush administration has clearly pursued a double standard when it comes
to fighting the so-called war on terrorism. It has carried out a dragnet
against Arab immigrants but has done nothing to round up right-wing domestic
terrorists. Bush immediately held bin Laden and the Taliban responsible for
the September 11 attack and began bombing Afghanistan, but White House
officials now predict that finding the perpetrators of the anthrax attacks
could take years.
The connections between the military and white supremacist and militia
groups are well known, and there are numerous cases of weapons and
ammunition from military bases going missing and ending up in the hands of
the far right. But rather than pursue such an investigation, homeland
security chief Tom Ridge has discounted the military connections to the
anthrax attacks as just one of "multiple leads" in the case.
The World Socialist Web Site does not claim to know the exact nature of the
anthrax attacks and to what extent they involved elements in the military.
One thing is certain, however: there is a great need to seriously
investigate these connections.
Anyone who thinks it is preposterous that elements within the state
apparatus and the backers of the Bush administration could actively be
involved in an assassination attempt or could have condoned such an act
should consider recent history in the United States.
>From the series of shutdowns of the federal government in 1995-96, to the
impeachment drive against Clinton and the theft of the 2000 election, the
Republican Party has shown it no longer plays by the traditional rules of
bourgeois democracy. After being thwarted by popular opposition during the
1990s, the right has concluded it can only achieve its agenda through
extra-parliamentary and illegal methods. That these forces will resort to
violence was demonstrated during the 2000 election when a Republican mob
attacked officials recounting votes in south Florida. At the time the Wall
Street Journal urged Bush to use an "iron fist" against his opponents.
In the face of such attacks the Democrats have proven their unwillingness
and incapacity to wage a genuine struggle against these fascistic forces.
They responded with cowardice even as leaders of their party are targeted
for assassination. At the same time the Democrats have concealed from the
American people the extent of the danger posed by the ultra-right.
This underscores the need for working people to advance their own
independent political struggle in defense of basic democratic rights.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|